It's Alright.

matthew made (you can click this)   

August 10, 2014 at 3:17pm
0 notes

July 20, 2014 at 9:47pm
169,584 notes
Reblogged from iguanamouth

(Source: iguanamouth, via afternoonsnoozebutton)

May 15, 2014 at 3:33pm
1,703 notes
Reblogged from nevver
nevver:

Intelligence only guarantees alienation

nevver:

Intelligence only guarantees alienation

earthnation:

earthnation:

what did one cell say to his sister cell that stepped on his toe

mitosis

(via moistbottom)

3:30pm
98,262 notes
Reblogged from biancadelfuckme

(Source: biancadelfuckme, via ruinedchildhood)

April 23, 2014 at 10:22am
340 notes
Reblogged from spiritguide

(Source: spiritguide, via afternoonsnoozebutton)

April 22, 2014 at 11:25am
55 notes
Reblogged from ayjay

In my view, a genuine pro-life political position takes its commitment to human life seriously, and is therefore willing to commit to supporting the lives of mothers and children rather than simply their births. I do not believe harsh punishment is the way to address the challenges facing mothers and infants that tragically conclude, at times, in abortion. Yet penalty seems to be the one way those operating under the “pro-life” banner feel comfortable expressing their commitment to life, which is why I find the usual rightwing anti-abortion approach underwhelming and incomplete. Compassion isn’t cheap, and it’s defined by its longevity: If we are to take seriously a cultural commitment to life, which I believe we should, then we’ll conduct ourselves with mercy and sensitivity to the difficulties that bring women to choose abortion, and will commit ourselves to concrete political change aimed at reducing those struggles.

— Elizabeth Stoker (via ayjay)

(via wesleyhill)

April 3, 2014 at 2:55pm
152 notes
Reblogged from therurrjurr
therurrjurr:

Pius XII

therurrjurr:

Pius XII

(via occident)

March 17, 2014 at 3:50am
4 notes
Reblogged from wesleyhill

The standard conservative Christian reaction to the expansion of the “nuclear family” to include gay families has been to redouble the defense of the 1950s hetero-patriarchal model, as if this model were of Divine institution. Modern “traditional marriage” apologists wax lyrical about the nuclear family as the fundamental cell-unit of the political community and above all as the healthiest environment for raising children.

Yet this argument is circular and unconvincing to anyone outside the conservative Christian subculture because it relies on precisely the social constructs called into question by the gay marriage debate. Naturally, if you live in a society that values the heterosexual nuclear family as the ideal, children raised within this structure will be ideally situated for participation in that structure, and social science will “prove” that this is the best environment for raising children, just as, had it existed in the thirteenth century, social science would have “proved” that the best way to raise a child was to send him to a monastery at 7 or 8-years-old.

— 

Aaron Taylor, “Queering the Marriage Debate?” | Ethika Politika (via wesleyhill)

bah

(via wesleyhill)

March 13, 2014 at 4:07am
408,110 notes
Reblogged from cloudamie

warpedesto:

do you ever just

make a friend and think

I am so glad this friend is mine

(Source: cloudamie, via hotboyproblems)